Strategic perspectives on civil rights, employment discrimination, sexual harassment, police misconduct, retaliation, and institutional accountability.
Dunphy v. Giuliani and the procedural line too many defendants try to erase There is a recurring defense impulse in high-profile civil litigation:...
Read More ›
Executive Summary Artificial intelligence is no longer a speculative issue for the federal courts. It is already present in judicial workflow. A 2026...
Read More ›
The problem is no longer whether warning signs exist. The problem is whether departments will adopt a noncompensatory, tiered, evidence-based screening architecture that forces...
Read More ›
Core Thesis Modern law-enforcement screening is failing at the front end because it remains too dependent on subjective, clinician-mediated judgment and too underdeveloped as...
Read More ›
Executive Summary This thought-piece argues that the NYPD’s current disciplinary database is not a meaningful transparency tool because it does not permit disciplined...
Read More ›
After the badge, the Department still makes consequential decisions—about letters, identification, restrictions, and status—but the public has no meaningful way to test whether those...
Read More ›
I. Support for the TRO Does Not Require Support for the Entire Approach I support the issuance of a temporary restraining order in the...
Read More ›
The Supreme Court’s decision in Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi, 607 U.S. ___ (2026) is an important narrowing of the practical reach of...
Read More ›
The public still asks the wrong questions about abuse. Why did she stay? Why did she go back? Why did she keep texting? Why...
Read More ›