The Sanders Firm, P.C.: SDP and Treatment of Mental Patients
The Sanders Firm, P.C. in New York, focused on preserving your civil rights in connection to subsequent due process, offers information regarding the treatment of mental patients and patient rights. The rights of mentally ill patients are important; there are many rulings by state and federal courts defining the scope of their civil rights. For a long time, mental illness was misunderstood and many respects still is misunderstood, often those who were deemed mentally ill were denied their civil rights through laws and actions that violated substantive due process. In the past 40 to 50 years, the courts have upheld the liberties and civil rights of those who are mentally ill.
O’Connor v. Donaldson
In terms of the treatment of mental illness and SDP, O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975) is an important case. The case involved a mentally ill plaintiff who had been confined for 15 years without any mental health treatment. The Court ruled that states could not confine someone who is not deemed to be a danger to others or to him/herself. Mentally ill patients have constitutional rights that are protected by the Fifth Amendment and upheld by the Fourteenth Amendment, overall, the main concerns involving the treatment of the mentally ill, focuses on who may be confined. Mentally ill patients who are considered to be a “danger to his or herself or others” or “gravely disabled” may be confined. More importantly, SDP must be followed in cases involving mentally ill patients.
SDP and Intervention
At The Sanders Firm, P.C., we understand that in the treatment of mental patients there is a delicate balance between a patient’s rights and their general welfare of society. There are times when in the treatment of the mentally ill that after determining someone is a danger to themselves or others or are disabled in a manner that makes them unable to function that intervention on the part of the state or local authorities is necessary. As we do with other civil rights complaints, The Sanders Firm, P.C. carefully weighs aspect of one’s case, before determining what may be the best course of action or the choices available to the individual.
What makes SDP involving the treatment of mental patients especially complex is the fact that states usually don not specifically define terms such as “gravely disabled” or “a danger to himself or others.” These terms and how one determines if a mentally ill patient meets certain criteria varies and leaves many open questions when we consider the civil rights of those who are mentally ill in accordance with SDP.
Preserving Your Rights
The civil rights lawyers at the Sanders Firm, P.C. are devoted to ensure that in the treatment of mental patients’ their SDP rights are preserved and liberties upheld. If you believe your civil rights in regards to this issue have been infringed upon, contact The Sanders Firm, P.C. For those in the New York City area we are your voice for justice.